by MJ | Nov 30, 2021 | Articles, Featured |
I support Women saying my body, my choice when it comes to abortion because I support their right to their Body Autonomy.
I support People’s Freedom to be who they are regardless of if they are Gay, Lesbian, and Bisexual sexuality because they have the right to their Body Autonomy.
I support our Younger Members of Society that are 20 that don’t want to have kids to either as a woman get their Tubal Ligation, or a hysterectomy. And for men to get a vasectomy.
I support Transgender Individuals doing Hormone Replacement and Transition Surgery because they have that right to their Body Autonomy just like anyone else.
Because I support Individual Freedom and the Right to Body Autonomy, I have to support those people that choose not to get vaccinated because they too have the right to Body Autonomy.
The Foundation of Freedom is the right to make decisions that are best for your own body and your life.
Individual Rights and Freedoms are a Foundation of a Just and Free Society, even if you choose not to agree with them for whatever reason that is, ALL of these Individuals still have that Right and Freedom to their Body Autonomy.
Where do I have the right to tell you or anyone else what to do with their body? I don’t and neither does the Government.
Individuality is what makes up the Character of a Society, the right to choose what to do with your body and your life.
If you take one of those away, will the others be looked at as well? If you force a position that body autonomy does not apply to vaccinations then you must take a logical step at a woman’s right to choose, LGBT Rights and Freedoms, and a Transgender Individuals right to the Right and Freedom. Body Autonomy is a Foundation of Individuality, and it is a paramount Right and Freedom, that no Government or individual should Question.
Yes, Freedom comes with Responsibility. And the Responsibility of Society is to look at things with a lens of balance between Individual Rights and Freedoms, and what is best for society as a whole. And if society starts taking away Individual Rights and Freedoms, we no longer live in a Free Society and we start to slip into tyranny.
This is why as a society we need to ensure that no government has the power or authority to take away our rights or diminish them for any reason. This is why Governments must be our servants.
People must learn to understand that the government is created by living human beings. It is a construct we created, therefore we have the right, freedom, and authority to replace the system when it no longer works in favor of the people that constructed it.
The time has come for people to take on the power and the mantle of the responsibility and accountability that Freedom comes with. We are ready to accept that and are willing to go the distance to keep that Freedom of our Society and our Sovereignty over those fictions we create.
by MJ | Jun 10, 2019 | Politics |
What a Joke this National Inquiry into Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women and Girls was.
A Genocide needs to be created and orchestrated by a single group. This was not and is not a genocide. Anyone who buys into this nonsense is a fool.
The RCMP did not go out and kill these women. Nor did any federal government employee or government agent.
And btw 1200 people dying over the course of 30 years does not make it a genocide. This is more left wing nonsense trying to perpetrate more nonsense.
These women got into cars with strange men, went to the city and got hooked on drugs, involved in prostitution, and drugs and died.
There is no idea of how many Jane Doe’s they took pictures of these women and are sitting in the Archives of the Coroners Offices. Why?? Because no evidence was ever presented to this inquiry, no facts were presented, no proof.
All this inquiry was, was just sad stories from all the grieving people. Then they made a bunch of conclusions and recommendations based on NO FACTS.
So I ask how can you take this seriously if this inquiry had no facts presented. Sure they list a number of missing and murdered First Nations Women, but they never explain how they all died. That just happens to be facts that are missing. They never talked about the day they went missing. Did they get into a fight with someone, did they get into drugs? Did they become prostitutes? What really happened to them? Did they get into a car and go to a different city and just not call home? Did they get into a car with a stranger and get killed? We don’t know, because this inquiry did NOT have any power to do a real inquiry or investigation.
When a majority of the inquiry focused on sad stories from grieving relatives are not facts you gain nothing.
In any criminal investigation, there are three sides to a story, your side, their side, and the facts. This is why hearing a story from a single relative about their loved one is so subjective, it does not get to the facts.
In a court proceeding, these would be considered subjective statements and would only be considered potential leads in an investigation, this does not create guilt or wrongdoing without proof or evidence.
This inquiry did nothing to answer real questions other than to quickly assign blame and does not get to the heart of the issues that are going on with First Nations, and Bands and the Reserve System.
The fact is the entire Reserve System needs to go, the Indian Act needs to be repealed wholesale, and be done away with. That is the first step to reconciliation. Then each band and reserve needs to be put under the provincial authority as if they were a town.
Any treaty that was signed needs to be eliminated. You want reconciliation then that means integration into the rest of society. The Indian Act is about Segregation from the rest of society. That means you become equal to the rest of us. No more special rights.
Because there are no facts presented to come to the conclusion of genocide in any way shape or form, there is no facts to show a genocide. There is no mass graves of dead Indians anywhere in the country. There are no mass culling’s that happened. These are simply individuals that made poor choices and decisions and now instead of accepting that fact they want to blame someone else for those poor choices and decisions.
So let me repeat that one more time. There was no Genocide as the National Inquiry into Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women and Girls provided no proof or evidence, that this was a coordinated plot or plan by any government agency, government employees, or any group of people associated with a government, or an independent group of people killing first nations for sport or entertainment.
While it is sad that these people died by their own hand, or were killed, it was individuals that did this. It was not a coordinated effort by any group.
Justice is when the perpetrators are put on trial and found guilty. This will never happen.
by MJ | Feb 10, 2019 | Politics |
When the
Constitution Act of 1982 was built a little understood heinous idea was put
into the Constitution Act.
This was the Section 33, known as the not withstanding clause. What this clause
does is specifically allow the government to pass a law to limit or practically
revoke your rights included in section 2 and section 7-15 of the Charter of Rights
and Freedoms.
When you understand the depth and magnitude of this you start to understand
that Canada is not a Democracy. It’s no where near a democracy. It’s an elected
Dictatorship.
When your rights can be taken away with simply passing a law you have to think
and question the sanity of such a thing.
I want to break down for you the reader what this means and help you understand
what this could turn this country into if we keep electing the bad actors we
have been electing to government.
Lets start breaking this down.
2. Everyone has the following fundamental
freedoms:
(a) freedom of conscience and
religion;
>>They
can pass a law to make it illegal practice a religion or all religion.
(b) freedom of thought, belief,
opinion and expression, including freedom of the press and other media of
communication;
>>They
can pass a law to limit or make it illegal to have freedom of thought, belief,
opinion and expression, including freedom of the press and other media of
communication that does not coincide with the government dogma or laws they
pass.
(c) freedom of peaceful assembly; and
>>They
can pass a law to limit or make it illegal to have the peaceful assembly, which
could also interfere with religious gatherings, as well as the public going to
meetings or groups or civic meetings.
(d) freedom of association.
>>They
can pass a law to limit or make it illegal to associate with certain types or
groups of people. To make associations to associate together, and including
unions and opposing political parties.
7. Everyone has the right to life,
liberty, and security of the person and the right not to be deprived thereof
except in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice.
>>This
means they can pass a law to take this right of not being executed without a
trial. Summary execution. This also means that you can be searched by cops just
walking or driving by without any recourse.
8. Everyone has the right to be
secure against unreasonable search or seizure.
>>When
you pass a law to take this away, this means the police and just come and take
you away, no warrant, and no due process of law.
9. Everyone has the right not to be
arbitrarily detained or imprisoned.
What does this mean? This means if they pass a law you can go into an oubliette and that’s that.
10. Everyone has the right on arrest or detention
(a) to be informed promptly of the
reasons therefor;
>> Gestapo anyone?
(b) to retain and instruct counsel without delay and to be informed of that right; and
>>No
right or protection to retain a lawyer, nor the right to even be informed of
that right.
(c) to have the validity of the
detention determined by way of habeas corpus and to be released if the
detention is not lawful.
>> No
right of habeas corpus? No right to have the validity of your detention checked
by a court? The removal of habeas corpus, an underlying principle in the rule
of law
11. Any person charged with an
offense has the right
(a) to be informed without
unreasonable delay of the specific offense;
>>Being
told whenever they get around to telling you what you are being charged with
whenever they feel like it, in 5 years maybe??
(b) to be tried within a reasonable time;
>>So
you might get tried before you die rotting away in jail..
(c) not to be compelled to be a witness in proceedings against that person in respect of the offense;
The ability
of the government to be able to remove this where you are forced to be a
witness against yourself… Let’s think about that. They torture you to get you
say shit and then use it against you..
(d) to be presumed innocent until proven guilty according to law in a fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal;
>>The
ability to remove this by law is a police state, it’s a communist state, it
socialist state and a fascist state. Just having the ability of the government
to remove this right from its citizens should scare the shit out of people.
(e) not to be denied reasonable bail
without just cause;
>>To
be able to make bail unreasonable should alarm people.
(f) except in the case of an offence under
military law tried before a military tribunal, to the benefit of trial by jury
where the maximum punishment for the offence is imprisonment for five years or
a more severe punishment;
>>To
be able to remove the rights of military persons by passing a law would and
should make any person serving this country question their rights. At that right,
they might as well go with the guillotine.
(g) not to be found guilty on account
of any act or omission unless, at the time of the act or omission, it
constituted an offence under Canadian or international law or was criminal
according to the general principles of law recognized by the community of
nations;
>>
Think about it the ability of the Judge to ignore this generally just makes me
question the sanity of the framers of this Constitution Act.
(h) if finally acquitted of the offence, not
to be tried for it again and, if finally found guilty and punished for the
offence, not to be tried or punished for it again; and
>>The
ability of the government to remove Double Jeopardy. The right for them to
charge you with the same crime and put you back in jail again?
Are you worried yet?
(i) if found guilty of the offence
and if the punishment for the offence has been varied between the time of
commission and the time of sentencing, to the benefit of the lesser punishment.
>>The ability to take away the protection against adjusting criminal sentences because you decided that all crimes should have longer sentences is something that should alarm you.
12. Everyone has the right not to be
subjected to any cruel and unusual treatment or punishment.
>>If
you do not question this and think long and hard about this and question why
this is even allowed to be suspended, to where the government can be cruel and
have unusual treatment and punishments you really are not wondering how far a
government could go by passing a law.
13. A witness who testifies in any
proceedings has the right not to have any incriminating evidence so given used
to incriminate that witness in any other proceedings, except in a prosecution
for perjury or for the giving of contradictory evidence.
>So if
you are a witness that gives incriminating evidence against yourself, you can’t
have that used against you, but if this is taken a way, you can have everything
you say used against you so the government can charge you with a crime.
14. A party or witness in any
proceedings who does not understand or speak the language in which the
proceedings are conducted or who is deaf has the right to the assistance of an
interpreter.
>>The
power to take away your right to an interpreter so you can understand any
charges being levied against you, how dastardly do they have to be to force you
to be charged and not understand why.
15. (1) Every individual is equal
before and under the law and has the right to the equal protection and equal
benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without
discrimination based on race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex,
age or mental or physical disability.
>>The
ability to take away your equality before and under the law, and equal
protection of the law, and then the right of the government to discriminate
against you based on your race, national or ethnic origin, color, religion,
sex, age, or mental or physical disability.
(2) Subsection (1) does not preclude any law,
program or activity that has as its object the amelioration of conditions of
disadvantaged individuals or groups including those that are disadvantaged
because of race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or
mental or physical disability.
>>The ability to pass a law to suspend anything the government passed to help disadvantaged people.
Now let’s understand section 33 in context so you can understand how easy it is for the government to do this. All they need to do is stand up in the house of commons or provincial legislature and suspend people’s rights for up to 4 years with the ability to renew could last indefinitely.
While what I write does sound drastic, and you think to yourself, this guy is over the top and is out to lunch, you must ask yourself this question, If the possibility is there for this type of abuse, is there a chance this could happen? You will automatically say no and tell yourself this guy is a quack.
Let us be honest, if the ability to remove people’s rights is there and you look at the successive governments of the past 5 years giving more and more power to intelligence agencies when you look at what is going on with how our government operating and passing laws that are against the interests of citizens.
You need to ask yourself, could it be possible? I submit, yes it is because when they start passing laws for intelligence agencies to spy on citizens, that means they are making records against people they deem undesirables or those likely to talk common sense to get people to wake up.
The Constitution Act took away people’s rights and freedoms they had before 1982, and this is the problem with it that no one wants to talk about. The dark secret is when it comes to rights if they are defined by law or a Constitution Act like we have with the ability of the government to suspend our rights for up to 5 years with the ability to renew it sets a very dangerous precedent when it comes a country being a Democracy.
If Canada was a Democracy, section 33 would have never been put into the Constitution Act. In essence, the country becomes an elected Dictatorship just like Nazi Germany or Communist China.
People need to know their history, but public education deliberately does not teach it. They teach about the Nazis but very little about the communists of Russia and China. They teach us the history that is written by despots and ideologues to keep the status quo.
